Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-10-04

Garg Builders vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bench: 2 — S. Abdul Nazeer

In Brief

Garg Builders contracted with Bharat Heavy Electricals to construct a boundary wall. The contract contained Clause 17, which expressly barred payment of interest on any moneys due to the contractor. When disputes arose and went to arbitration, the arbitrator awarded pendente lite interest despite the clause. The High Court set aside this award. The Supreme Court held that Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 gives primacy to the parties' agreement. When a contract explicitly bars interest, the arbitrator cannot award pendente lite interest. The Court found the interest-barring clause was not ultra vires the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and consistent with Section 3(3) of the Interest Act, 1978. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Interest - Pre-Award Contract - Interest Clause Pendente Lite Interest Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login