Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-11-18 partly_allowed

Ghanshyam Sarda vs Sashikant Jha, Director & Ors

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

J.K. Jute Mills Company, a sick industrial company under BIFR supervision, executed a conveyance deed in April 2013 transferring its Katihar property to a third party. The Supreme Court issued a restraint order on 8 May 2014 prohibiting disposal of capital assets without Court permission. However, the deed was registered on 2 July 2014, after the restraint order. The Court held that although the deed was executed before the restraint order, transfer of immovable property is only effective upon registration under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act. Therefore, the Company and its Directors violated the restraint order. The transferee was not a party to proceedings and unaware of the order, so was not liable. The Court imposed fines on the Company and certain Directors rather than invalidating the transfer, which had been delegated to BIFR for reconsideration.</summary_100>

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Court Transfer of Property Company Law Sick Industrial Company BIFR Injunction Registration Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login