Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-10 disposed

GHULAM NABI AZAD vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Bench: 3 — N.V. Ramana, R. Subhash Reddy, B. R. Gavai

In Brief

This landmark judgment addresses the communication shutdown in Jammu and Kashmir following the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019. The Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and expression, and freedom to carry on trade and business over the internet, are fundamental rights protected under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g). Internet shutdowns indefinitely are impermissible; any suspension must be temporary, proportionate, and subject to judicial review. Orders restricting fundamental rights must be published and reasoned. The Court established that restrictions must meet a proportionality test balancing security needs against individual liberty. Importantly, Section 144 CrPC orders must state material facts and cannot suppress legitimate democratic expression. The Court directed periodic review of suspension orders within seven days and cautioned against repetitive orders as abuse of power.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Fundamental Rights Freedom of Speech and Expression Internet Rights Telecommunications Law Public Order Proportionality Judicial Review Rule of Law Terrorism and National Security Media Freedom Right to Information

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login