Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-05-10 allowed

GIRISH KUMAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah

In Brief

Girish Kumar challenged the promotion of a fellow employee (Respondent 3) to Section Officer, arguing that the employee had not completed the mandatory three years of continuous actual service in the feeder cadre as required by the Recruitment Rules, 1967. Although the employee had been granted a deemed date of promotion under the Seniority Rules, 1982 (dated 7.10.2005), he was only actually promoted to Office Superintendent on 22.10.2007, and then to Section Officer on 1.2.2008. The Supreme Court held that the Seniority Rules and Recruitment Rules operate in different fields and for different purposes. The deemed date affects only inter se seniority, not eligibility for promotion. Actual continuous service on the feeder cadre is required under the Recruitment Rules. The Court allowed the appeal, quashed the High Court's judgment, restored the Additional Divisional Commissioner's order setting aside the employee's promotion, and directed that the appellant be promoted instead.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Administrative Law Seniority and Promotion Statutory Interpretation Recruitment Rules

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login