Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-08 allowed

Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited vs Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

A manufacturing company claimed full deduction of dividend income exempt under Section 10(33) without corresponding disallowance of interest expenditure. The Assessing Officer disallowed part of the interest expense as attributable to earning the dividend. The Supreme Court held that Section 14A applies to disallow deductions for expenditure incurred in earning dividend income under Section 115-O, even though the company must pay additional tax on distributed dividends rather than the shareholder. However, the Court found no adequate reasoning by the Assessing Officer for departing from its consistent position in earlier years or for disregarding available interest-free funds. The appeal was allowed, and the company was entitled to full benefit of the dividend income claim without deduction for that assessment year.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Deductions Exempt Income Dividend Income Tax Legislation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login