Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-01-06 allowed

GOLDEN FOOD PRODUCTS INDIA vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

The Ghaziabad Development Authority cancelled the appellant's highest bid (₹29,500 per sq m) for a 3,150 sq m industrial plot after declaring him the winner, citing that smaller plots in the same scheme fetched higher prices. The Supreme Court held this arbitrary and unconstitutional. Once valid bids are accepted and the highest bidder declared, cancellation on extraneous grounds—comparison with dissimilar smaller plots—violates fairness principles and Article 14. The authority must exercise discretion within tender conditions. The Court allowed the appeal, quashed the cancellation, and directed issuance of the allotment letter after re-deposit of earnest money.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Judicial Review Public Auctions and Tenders Article 14 - Equality Before Law Arbitrariness Public Procurement Government Contracts

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login