Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-07 allowed

Gottumukkala Venkata Krishamraju vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery Tribunals appointed before September 1, 2016 were entitled to serve only until age 62 or 5 years, whichever was earlier. An amendment to Section 6 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 extended the retirement age to 65 years. The Supreme Court held that the amended provision applied to officers already serving on the amendment date, entitling them to continue until age 65 years. The Court reasoned that the legislature used 'substituted,' not 'amended,' and contrasted the new Section 6 with Section 6A, which explicitly excluded incumbents. The amendment's purpose—reducing case backlogs in tribunals—supported extending the benefit to serving officers. The Court allowed the petitions and directed reinstatement with continuity of service.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Service Law Debt Recovery Tribunals Amendments

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login