Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-02-17 dismissed

Gudipalli Siddhartha Reddy vs State C.B.I

Bench: 2 — Rajesh Bindal, Manmohan

In Brief

A surviving partner in a mutual suicide pact can be criminally liable for abetting the other's suicide under Indian law, the Supreme Court held. The case involved actress Pratyusha and her boyfriend Reddy, who both consumed pesticide in 2002; Pratyusha died while Reddy survived. The Court upheld Reddy's conviction under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide), holding that his participation in the suicide pact, combined with purchasing the poison and jointly consuming it, constituted intentional aid to the deceased's suicide. The Court rejected allegations of murder by strangulation or sexual assault, finding overwhelming forensic and medical evidence of death by organophosphate poisoning. A surviving partner's participation in a mutual suicide pact does not eliminate criminal liability.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Abetment Suicide Evidence Forensic Evidence Medical Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Mutual Suicide Pact Section 313 Statement Adverse Inference

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login