In Brief
A police officer promoted for exceptional bravery was dismissed in 1991 based on alleged links to a terrorist gang without a formal inquiry. The appellant challenged this, alleging malafides by senior officers who retaliated over a property dispute. The High Court upheld dismissal without addressing malafides. The Supreme Court found the non-consideration of uncontested malafide allegations problematic. Since the appellant had reached superannuation and was elderly and hospitalized, the Court declined to order a fresh inquiry. Instead, it modified the dismissal order into compulsory retirement under civil service rules and directed payment of terminal benefits within eight weeks.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.