Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-13 allowed

GURNAM SINGH (D) BY LRS vs LEHNA SINGH(D) BY LRS

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah

In Brief

In this civil appeal, the Supreme Court examined the scope of jurisdiction of High Courts in entertaining second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The case involved a dispute over inheritance regarding suit land, with conflicting decisions by the trial court, first appellate court, and high court. The Supreme Court held that the High Court had exceeded its jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence when deciding the second appeal. The Court emphasized that second appeals under Section 100 CPC are limited to matters involving a substantial question of law, and the High Court cannot simply substitute its opinion for that of the first appellate court. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's judgment and restoring the first appellate court's decision, thereby dismissing the original suit. The judgment serves as a significant reminder to High Courts regarding their limited role in second appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Evidence and Proof Re-appreciation of Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login