Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-27 allowed

Gurnam Singh (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors vs Gurbachan Kaur (D) By Lrs. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that a decree passed by a court against deceased parties without their legal representatives being substituted on record is a nullity, striking at the court's very authority. When a party to an appeal dies, if no substitution application is filed within 90 days under CPC Order 22, the appeal automatically abates and the court loses jurisdiction. The High Court therefore lacked authority to pass the impugned decree. The legal representatives may challenge such decrees in any proceeding, including execution, as nullities that cannot be cured by consent. The appeal by the legal representatives was allowed and the decree set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Limitation Jurisdiction Decree and Nullity Substitution of Parties

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login