Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-27 partly_allowed

Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd vs Nirlac Chemicals through its Manager & Ors

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta

In Brief

Haffkine, a Maharashtra vaccine manufacturer, floated a tender for bulk polio drugs. Two bidders participated: Nirlac (a long-standing distributor) and Bionet. Nirlac's bid was rejected as technically non-compliant; Bionet was awarded the tender. Nirlac challenged this in the High Court, which found that Bionet's bid had not been opened in the presence of Nirlac's representatives, violating Central Vigilance Commission guidelines. The Supreme Court upheld that this procedural violation vitiated the entire tender. Although Nirlac also failed to satisfy the tender condition requiring generation of 70 million doses of business, the Court directed Haffkine to award a 120-million-dose contract to Nirlac at its quoted price in the public interest, while restraining further purchases from Bionet and mandating future tenders be floated electronically with clear terms.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Public Procurement Tender Law Administrative Law Central Vigilance Commission Guidelines Government Contracts Pharmaceutical Regulation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login