Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-05-19 partly_allowed

Hakim vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

Two appellants, Hakim (a retired army officer) and Umesh (an advocate), were convicted under Section 326A IPC for pouring acid on a woman in Mathura in 2014, causing chemical burns and 90% vision loss in the left eye. The Supreme Court upheld their conviction, finding that medical evidence and eye-witness testimony adequately proved the offence beyond doubt. The Court reduced Hakim's life sentence to 10 years imprisonment, considering his age (73), health conditions, and parity with a co-accused's sentence. Umesh's life sentence was upheld, holding that being an officer of court he deserves no leniency.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Acid Attack Grievous Injury Evidence and Proof Sentencing Mitigating Factors Concurrent Findings Appellate Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login