Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-05-14 allowed

Harcharan Dass Gupta vs Union of India

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Joymalya Bagchi

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006 overrides the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. When an MSME registered in Delhi invokes the Facilitation Council under Section 18 of the MSMED Act, the Council where the supplier is located has jurisdiction to conduct arbitration, regardless of contractual clauses specifying a different seat. The Court set aside the Karnataka High Court's order that had declared the Delhi Arbitration Centre lacked jurisdiction, and directed the arbitral proceedings to continue, emphasizing that statutory protections for MSMEs cannot be overridden by private agreements.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Law Statutory Interpretation Jurisdiction Seat of Arbitration Dispute Resolution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login