In Brief
In this criminal appeal, appellants were convicted by the trial court under sections of the Indian Penal Code for assault, wrongful restraint, attempted murder, murder and criminal intimidation. The appellants challenged the conviction, arguing procedural defects and evidentiary weaknesses. The Supreme Court found reasonable doubt regarding the accused's identity and their linkage to the offence, noting the victim subsequently died, critical eyewitness (victim's 10-year-old daughter) turned hostile, and significant delays in FIR lodging. The Court acquitted the appellants, setting aside convictions from both trial and high courts, emphasizing that in fatal cases, prosecution must establish identity beyond doubt.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.