Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 31 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-06 partly_allowed

Harita Sunil Parab vs R.D. Upadhay : State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — Pinaki Chandra Ghose

In Brief

Harita Sunil Parab filed a writ petition and special leave petitions challenging orders by the High Court of Bombay. In the writ petition, the Supreme Court directed the transfer of FIR No. 351/16 (alleging offences under IPC sections 354, 354A, 323, 506, 509, and 376) to Crime Branch Delhi for thorough investigation and directed submission of a report to the appropriate court. In the special leave petitions, the Court dismissed the challenges to the High Court's bailable warrant order issued due to the petitioner's alleged disruption of court proceedings and refusal to accept contempt notice. The Court declined to interfere, noting incomplete service and that it expressed no opinion on the factual merits of either matter."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Investigation Transfer Contempt of Court Bailable Warrant

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login