Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-11 allowed

Hetal Chirag Patel and Ors vs State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc. Etc

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed whether a High Court Division Bench correctly dismissed intra-court appeals for delay of 233 days where the appellants were not original parties to the writ petition but became aggrieved by the Single Judge's order. The Court held that being excluded from the original proceedings but affected by the judgment constitutes sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, warranting condonation of delay. The Court set aside the High Court's dismissal, allowed the appeals, and restored the matter for the Division Bench to decide the appeals on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Limitation Law Condonation of Delay Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login