Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-11-27 allowed

HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 3 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Surya Kant, V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

Hindustan Construction Company and other construction contractors challenged Section 87 of the Arbitration Act, 1996, which revived automatic-stay of arbitral awards pending court challenges, and various provisions of the Insolvency Code. The Supreme Court struck down Section 87 as manifestly arbitrary, holding that the original Section 36 never mandated automatic-stay. Earlier judgments establishing automatic-stay were per incuriam. The 2015 Amendment Act's beneficial reforms apply to all post-October 2015 court proceedings. The Court overruled prior precedents and rejected challenges to the Insolvency Code as contractual disputes render debts 'disputed' and outside its scope.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Law Constitutional Law Statutory Interpretation Public Law Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Judicial Review Legislative Competence Retrospective Legislation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login