Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-11-29 allowed

Ian Peter Morris vs Asstt. Commnr. of Income Tax

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Ian Peter Morris was paid Rs. 21 lakhs by Synergy Credit Corporation Limited under a Non-Compete Agreement, which restricted him from carrying on computer software business for five years. The revenue authorities treated this as salary and levied interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court held that where a receipt is characterized as salary, the advance tax provisions do not apply, and therefore no interest under Sections 234B and 234C can be charged. The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order regarding interest liability.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Salary vs. Capital Receipt Non-Compete Agreement Interest Advance Tax

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login