Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-09-25 partly_allowed

For the Govt. of Puduchery : Mr vs G. Pragasam, AOR, Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv., Mr. S. Manuraj, Advocate

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Government of Puducherry sought extension of time to compile data on Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Court setup. The Supreme Court granted the request, extending the deadline by six weeks for collating the required information. The Court also directed the Union of India to submit a comprehensive status report detailing the progress of establishing POCSO Courts and implementation of related Court orders. An earlier application was rejected. The case involves judicial review of protective measures, including CRPF security, and monitoring of specialized court infrastructure for child protection.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Judicial Administration Child Protection (POCSO)

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login