Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-17 partly_allowed

For the Govt. of Puducherry : Mr vs G. Pragasam, AOR, Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv., Mr. S. Manuraj, Advocate

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This suo moto writ petition concerns the Government of Puducherry's compliance with Supreme Court orders regarding the establishment of exclusive POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Courts in Madhya Pradesh. The State filed an affidavit confirming that 28 exclusive POCSO Courts are already operational. The Court acknowledged the State's compliance efforts and waived the previously imposed cost of Rs. 10 Lakhs, while directing the State to ensure all requisite exclusive POCSO Courts are properly established. The question of setting up Human Rights Courts was deferred to a related petition.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law POCSO Courts Judicial Administration Suo Moto Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login