Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-04-06 allowed

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs VIKRAM SUJITKUMAR BHATIA

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

In this appeal challenging a High Court decision, the Supreme Court held that the amended Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (effective June 1, 2015) applies retrospectively to searches conducted under Section 132 before that date. The amendment changed the condition for assessing third parties from documents "belonging to" a non-searched person to documents "pertaining to" them—broadening the net. The Court found this was a necessary amendment to remedy a Delhi High Court judgment that had restricted the Revenue's power to assess third parties. Since the relevant date for machinery provisions is when material is received by the Assessing Officer (not the search date), and both receipt and notices here occurred after the amendment, the amended Section 153C applied. The Court rejected arguments that the amendment affects vested substantive rights, holding that no such right exists before notice is issued.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Procedure Statutory Interpretation Search and Seizure Assessment Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login