In Brief
This case challenges the Sabarimala Temple's centuries-old practice of prohibiting women aged 10-50 from entry and worship, citing Hindu custom and religious practice. The petitioners argued this violates constitutional equality and non-discrimination principles. The Court did not decide the merits but identified five critical constitutional questions for a larger bench: whether gender-based exclusion based on biological factors violates Articles 14 and 15; whether it is an essential religious practice protected under Articles 25-26; whether a statutory board financed by the state can enforce such practices; whether the governing rule is valid; and whether it conflicts with the underlying statute. The case was remanded to a Constitution Bench for comprehensive examination of these fundamental rights and religious freedom issues.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.