In Brief
Two appellants were convicted of murder and attempted murder as members of an armed unlawful assembly of six men who attacked a family, killing one person and injuring two others. The appellants argued they were merely friends accompanying the primary antagonists and had played no active role in the violence. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that when members of an unlawful assembly are proven to share a common object of violence, each member is vicariously liable for offences committed in furtherance of that object, regardless of individual participation. The prosecution need not prove separate acts by each member; mere membership suffices.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.