Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-24 allowed

J. Balaji Singh vs Diwakar Cole & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

J. Balaji Singh filed a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. The Trial Court dismissed the suit. The first Appellate Court allowed the plaintiff's application to adduce additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC and remanded the case for fresh trial. The High Court, hearing the defendants' appeal, re-examined the case on merits and restored the Trial Court's judgment. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction: when examining the legality of a remand order under Order 43 Rule 1(u), it can only examine legality, not decide on merits. The Court allowed the appeal, restored the first Appellate Court's remand order, and directed the Trial Court to redecide the suit within six months.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Appellate Procedure Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Order 43 Rule 1 CPC Evidence—Additional Evidence Remand Orders Judicial Review—Scope of Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login