Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-04-19 partly_allowed

JADUNATH SINGH vs ARVIND KUMAR & ANR. ETC

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Sanjay Kumar

In Brief

In this criminal appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether a High Court's grant of bail to three murder convicts was justified. The accused had been convicted of murdering two men in 2011 and initially sought bail after serving over ten years. However, while the case was on trial, two of the accused—Chandra Kumar and Rishi Kumar—killed a police constable who was escorting them from court, then absconded and fired on police during arrest. The Court held that such serious subsequent conduct negated bail eligibility despite long incarceration. It cancelled bail for Chandra Kumar and Rishi Kumar but upheld bail for Arvind Kumar, as he was not involved in the constable's murder. The Court emphasized that grave conduct during trial must be considered in bail decisions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Law Murder Police Constable – Protection Judicial Custody Absconding Accused Public Safety

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login