In Brief
Jane Kaushik, a transgender woman, filed a writ petition after being terminated from two private schools in India despite the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. She challenged systemic discrimination in education and employment. The Supreme Court held that gender identity recognition is fundamental to dignity under Article 21. The Court found that while the 2019 Act prohibits discrimination, its implementation mechanisms were absent, enabling continued marginalization. The Court recognized that substantive equality requires positive governmental and private sector obligations, established an Advisory Committee to develop comprehensive inclusion policies, awarded compensation for discrimination, and issued binding directions for compliance, emphasizing that constitutional rights must translate into lived reality, not remain aspirational on paper.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.