Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-04-30 dismissed

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS vs M/S RAMKRISHNA FORGING LIMITED

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Vineet Saran

In Brief

A small-scale industrial consumer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board sought to reduce its sanctioned load from 4000 KVA to 1325 KVA. The Board refused, citing a three-year lock-in clause in the most recent enhancement agreement. The Supreme Court held that successive load enhancement agreements for the same connection should be treated as amendments to the initial agreement, not independent fresh agreements. Therefore, the three-year period under the Regulations applies from the original connection date, not the latest enhancement. Since the reduction application was filed after three years from the initial agreement, it should have been allowed. The appeal was dismissed, and the consumer's application was deemed approved under the electricity regulations.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Utility Regulation Administrative Law Consumer Protection Contract Interpretation Regulatory Compliance

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login