Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-27

Joseph Shine vs Union of India

Bench: 5 — Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar, R.F. Nariman, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalizes adultery, and Section 198(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure are unconstitutional. The Court found that these provisions treat women as property of their husbands, deny them sexual agency and autonomy, and perpetuate patriarchal notions of marriage. The provisions are manifestly arbitrary and violate Articles 14, 15, and 21. The Court rejected arguments about protecting marriage sanctity and ruled that adultery should be treated as a civil wrong (ground for divorce) rather than a criminal offence, as criminalizing it violates the right to privacy and dignity. The exemption of women from prosecution does not constitute valid protective discrimination. Previous Court decisions upholding these provisions were overruled.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Gender Equality Women's Rights Criminal Law Adultery Marital Law Fundamental Rights Right to Privacy Right to Dignity Non-discrimination

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login