Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-09-25 disposed

Bench: 5 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai, Surya Kant, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

The Supreme Court took suo motu notice of remarks made by a High Court of Karnataka judge during live-streamed proceedings on 6 June and 28 August 2024, which were perceived as misogynistic and prejudicial to communities. The judge later tendered a public apology on 21 September 2024. The Court held that while such casual observations reflecting gender or community bias should be avoided, it would conclude proceedings based on the apology, reaffirming that judges must be aware of their predispositions, and that live-streamed proceedings demand heightened responsibility from all judicial stakeholders to avoid remarks that may negatively impact the institution.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Judicial Conduct Judicial Ethics Live-streaming of Court Proceedings Judicial Accountability Institutional Dignity Judicial Discretion Misogyny in Judicial Remarks

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login