In Brief
A retired Supreme Court Judge and former Press Council Chairman published Facebook posts criticizing Mahatma Gandhi and Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. Both Houses of Parliament passed Resolutions condemning these remarks. The Judge petitioned to quash the Resolutions, arguing they violated his fundamental right to freedom of speech and that Parliament lacked jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that freedom of speech in Parliament under Article 105 is absolute and protects parliamentary discussions on matters of general public interest. The Resolutions were opinion declarations on public figures' legacies—matters of general public interest—and remained within procedural rules. They inflicted no civil consequences and violated no fundamental rights. The petition was dismissed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.