In Brief
A Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal officer challenged adverse personal remarks made against her by a High Court Division Bench reviewing her judgment. The remarks called her conduct lacking in "integrity" and described the tribunal as a venue for "hoodwinked" decisions. The Supreme Court held that judicial officers cannot be condemned unheard and courts must avoid strong disparaging language in orders. While courts may address judicial errors, proper procedure requires referral to the High Court's administrative side for formal inquiry with notice and opportunity for the officer to respond. The offensive observations were set aside, but the High Court retains discretion to pursue administrative remedies if warranted.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.