Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-13 allowed

K.K. Mishra vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr

Bench: 3 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

K.K. Mishra, a Congress spokesperson, faced defamation charges under Section 500 IPC for statements made at a press conference alleging nepotism by the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh. The Supreme Court quashed the prosecution and conviction, holding that the allegedly defamatory statements—concerning appointment of persons from the Chief Minister's in-laws' area and phone calls by his relatives—had no reasonable nexus with the discharge of public duties. The Court found the Public Prosecutor had failed to independently scrutinize materials before filing the complaint under Section 199(2) CrPC, merely following government orders. Where statements lack nexus with official functions, the special procedure under Section 199(2)-(4) is unavailable; the ordinary private complaint remedy under Section 199(6) applies instead.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Defamation Public Officials and Defamation Code of Criminal Procedure Role of Public Prosecutor Constitutional Law Right to Free Speech

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login