In Brief
This appeal challenged a High Court order directing inquiry under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code based on alleged forgery and contradictory statements in an affidavit. The Supreme Court held that mere contradictory statements or allegations of forgery do not automatically justify initiating such an inquiry. The court must form a satisfaction that the inquiry is required in the interests of justice and is appropriate given the factual matrix and consequences of prosecution. Finding no such satisfaction, the Court set aside the order and remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.