Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-05 allowed

Kalpana vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Bench: 2 — (Unknown Judge 1), (Unknown Judge 2)

In Brief

Kalpana, sister of the deceased's husband, was named in an FIR for dowry death but not chargesheeted. During trial, the complainant filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon her as an accused. The High Court allowed this application. The Supreme Court held that mere naming in an FIR, without evidence, does not justify summoning an accused. As the complainant's own trial statement contained no allegation against Kalpana, and she lived and worked separately in another state, there was no justifiable ground for summoning her. The Court set aside the order summoning her as an accused.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Dowry Prohibition Criminal Procedure Section 319 Cr.P.C. Summoning of Accused

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login