In Brief
This case concerns multiple review petitions and writ petitions filed in response to an earlier Supreme Court judgment on religious practices. The Court held that compliance with its judgments is a non-negotiable, non-discretionary constitutional obligation binding all authorities, officials, and citizens. While States may consult stakeholders on implementation modalities, they cannot rewrite or evade the substantive decision. The right to criticise judgments remains protected, but organised resistance to enforcement is impermissible. Review petitions must follow strict procedural rules and cannot serve to reargue decided matters. All petitions were disposed of accordingly.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.