In Brief
The Supreme Court was seized with multiple review petitions and writ petitions relating to a religious practice, raising fundamental constitutional questions about the scope of freedom of religion, the rights of religious denominations, the meaning of 'morality' as a constitutional restriction, and the standing of non-members to challenge religious practices through public interest litigation. The Court referred these significant constitutional questions to a larger Bench for authoritative adjudication, recognizing their importance to religious law and constitutional jurisprudence.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.