Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-10-22 dismissed

KARAN SINGH vs DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Ajay Rastogi

In Brief

Karan Singh sought pension benefits from Delhi Transport Corporation after voluntarily retiring under the 1993 VRS scheme. The key issue was whether his total service qualified him for the minimum 10-year requirement for pension eligibility. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal, holding that Singh's qualifying service (including a 2-month training period but excluding 98 days of leave without pay) totaled only 9 years 4 months and 6 days—falling short by about 8 months. The Court applied statutory pension rules strictly: leave periods with salary count; unpaid leave does not. Since Singh did not meet the 10-year threshold, he was not entitled to pension.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Pension Law Civil Service Law Employment Law Administrative Law Voluntary Retirement Scheme Qualifying Service

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login