Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-11-22 partly_allowed

KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION vs JSW ENERGY LIMITED

Bench: 3 — K.M. Joseph, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. sought to challenge a High Court order that set aside tariff determinations by the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission. The Supreme Court examined whether a power purchase agreement between KPTCL and JSW Energy (formerly JTPCL) concluded before the Electricity Reforms Act commenced was exempt from regulatory jurisdiction. The Court held there was no concluded contract despite Government approval of a Rs.2.60/unit tariff, as the parties contemplated a formal agreement and several material terms remained unresolved. The Court set aside the High Court's conclusion on that point and remitted other findings (regarding perversity and the plant's IPP/CPP status) for fresh consideration. It directed JSW Energy to repay Rs.50 crores pending final determination.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login