Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-27 allowed

Karunanidhi vs Seetharama Naidu & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

In this succession dispute involving the heirs of Perumal Naidu, the Supreme Court considered whether descendants of pre-deceased daughters could claim shares in properties received by female heirs under a Will. The Court held that the High Court erred by applying Section 15(2)(a) of the Hindu Succession Act for the first time in a second appeal without framing it as a substantial question of law. Additionally, since the category of heirs (daughter of a pre-deceased daughter of a pre-deceased daughter) was added to Class I only in 2005, it had no retrospective application to a death occurring in 1987. The Court restored the trial court's decree, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit and upholding that the female heirs had acquired absolute ownership, not merely life interest, in the properties bequeathed to them.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Hindu Succession Act Intestate Succession Female Hindu Heirs Wills and Testamentary Succession Absolute Interest versus Life Interest Class I Heirs Retrospective Application of Statutes Appellate Procedure Substantial Question of Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login