Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-28 dismissed

KIRPAL SINGH & ORS vs KAMLA DEVI & ORS

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Jaipal Singh, a Punjab landowner holding 221.72 acres, had surplus land determination proceedings pending under the 1953 Act when the 1972 Act came into force. He sold land to Mohan Singh in 1974, who later sold it to the appellants in 1989. The appellants claimed the transferred land should benefit from the 1972 Act's provisions requiring the owner's own land be included in the surplus pool first. The Court held that pending surplus determination proceedings must be completed under the 1953 Act per Section 33(2)(ii) of the 1972 Act. The definition of 'surplus area' in the 1953 Act encompasses selection of permissible area, making it an integral part of the determination process. Therefore, the 1972 Act's provisions did not apply, and the transferred land remained properly included in the surplus pool. Appeal dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Agrarian Law Land Ceiling Succession and Property Statutory Interpretation Transitional Provisions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login