Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-08-05

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Kew Precision Parts Private Limited & Ors

Bench: 2 — Indira Banerjee, J.K. Maheshwari

In Brief

A bank filed a petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to initiate insolvency proceedings against a manufacturing company for defaulting on loans. The corporate debtor challenged this on grounds that the application was barred by limitation, as the default occurred in 2015 and the petition was filed in 2019—more than three years later. The Supreme Court held that while the limitation period is ordinarily three years from default, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing the petition without allowing the bank to show sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court emphasized that written promises to pay time-barred debts are valid contracts under the Indian Contract Act, and that the Adjudicating Authority must permit additional documents and evidence before finally rejecting an application. The appeal was allowed and remanded.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Limitation Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Financial Creditor Debt Recovery Contract Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login