Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-02-16 partly_allowed

Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Limited vs Ambuj A. Kasliwal & Ors

Bench: 3 — A.S. Bopanna

In Brief

Kotak Mahindra Bank successfully challenged a High Court order that waived the pre-deposit requirement for an appeal by debtors before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The Bank had acquired a non-performing asset and obtained a recovery decree for Rs.145 crores. The Supreme Court held that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 is mandatory and cannot be entirely waived. The Court modified the order to require twenty-five per cent deposit of the balance debt (Rs.68.19 crores) rather than fifty per cent, recognizing that substantial compensation had already been appropriated towards the debt. The judgment reaffirmed that statutory pre-deposit conditions are not optional, though DRAT retains discretion to reduce (not eliminate) the requirement for recorded reasons.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Recovery of Debts Bankruptcy and Insolvency Appellate Procedure Debt Recovery Tribunal Pre-Deposit Requirements Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login