Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-12-19 allowed

Kousik Pal vs BM Birla Heart Research Centre & Ors

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Karol, Manoj Misra

In Brief

Kousik Pal's mother died shortly after receiving treatment at B.M. Birla Heart Research Centre, with a misleading discharge summary stating her condition was "stable." The West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission found deficiencies in patient care and unqualified personnel, awarding ₹20 lakh compensation. The High Court Division Bench reversed this on jurisdictional grounds, claiming the Commission lacked authority. The Supreme Court clarified that regulatory commissions have distinct, autonomous jurisdiction to adjudicate deficiency in patient care and award compensation—a power separate from medical councils' exclusive authority over professional negligence. The Court restored the ₹20 lakh award and criticized the Division Bench's over-restrictive interpretation, emphasizing that patient care standards can be adjudicated by regulatory bodies without encroaching on medical negligence jurisdiction.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Medical Law Patient Rights Regulatory Bodies Clinical Negligence Compensation Jurisdiction Healthcare Consumer Protection Professional Misconduct

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login