Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-23 dismissed

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Mandi Yard, Alwar vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Alwar

Bench: 3 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

Agricultural Produce Market Committees in Rajasthan sought exemption from service tax on fees collected for renting/leasing shops and land to traders. They claimed the activity was mandatory and statutory under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, and fell within the exemption granted by Board Circular No. 89/7/2006 for activities performed by public authorities as statutory obligations. The Supreme Court held that exemptions in taxing statutes must be strictly construed. Section 9(2) of the 1961 Act uses 'may' (discretionary), not 'shall' (mandatory), so renting activities are not mandatory statutory duties. Since the fees go to the Market Committee Fund (not Government Treasury) and activities are discretionary, the exemption conditions are not met. The Court dismissed all appeals, finding the Market Committees liable for service tax on renting of immovable property for the period up to 30.06.2012.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Tax Taxation Statutory Exemptions Agricultural Marketing Public Authority Excise and Service Tax

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login