Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-09-13 allowed

KUKREJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

In Brief

Kukreja Construction and other developers owned land reserved under development plans for roads and public amenities. They surrendered the land and constructed the amenities at their own cost, but were granted only 25% additional development rights (TDR) instead of 100% claimed. After the Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Godrej & Boyce clarified entitlement to 100% TDR for amenity construction, many developers filed writ petitions. The High Court dismissed several on grounds of delay and laches, though allowing others on merits. The Supreme Court held that delay does not bar compensation claims when the legal right is determined; compensation is a constitutional obligation. It set aside dismissals based on delay and ordered consideration of all cases under the Godrej & Boyce principles.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Property Rights Constitutional Law Urban Development Development Control Regulations Administrative Law Procedural Law Delay and Laches

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login