Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Thursday, 29 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-08 allowed

Kuljeet Kaur Mahal & Anr vs Santokh Singh Sandhu & Ors

Bench: 1 — Harinder Singh Sidhu

In Brief

Kuljeet Kaur Mahal and her husband, adoptive parents of a minor girl under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, sought to modify an adoption order that imposed a condition requiring them to bring the child to India annually to meet her biological father and grandfather. The US Embassy rejected the adoption order due to this condition. The High Court held that the 2015 Act does not authorize courts to impose such conditions on adoption orders. Once adopted, the child becomes the lawful child of the adoptive parents with all ties to the biological family severed. The statutory framework provides for post-adoption monitoring through separate regulatory procedures, making court-imposed periodic contact conditions unnecessary and legally unsupported. The condition was accordingly quashed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Family Law Adoption Juvenile Justice Inter-country Adoption Child Welfare Court Orders and Conditions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login