Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-03-26

LAXMI PAT SURANA vs UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai, Krishna Murari

In Brief

Union Bank of India sought to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceeding (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against Surana Metals Limited, which had provided a guarantee for a loan originally extended to M/s. Mahaveer Construction, a proprietary firm. The appellant challenged the proceedings on two grounds: (i) that CIRP cannot be initiated against a corporate guarantor when the principal borrower is not a corporate person, and (ii) that the application was barred by limitation as it was filed more than three years after the loan was declared a non-performing asset. The Supreme Court held that a corporate guarantor is liable as a corporate debtor when the principal borrower defaults, as the guarantor's liability is coextensive with the principal borrower's under contract law. It further held that the limitation period can be extended under Section 18 of the Limitation Act when the debtor acknowledges its liability in writing, allowing the financial creditor to initiate CIRP within three years of such acknowledgment. The appeal was disposed of, leaving other contentions for determination before the NCLT.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Guarantee and Suretyship Limitation Law Corporate Debtor Financial Creditor Default and Non-Performing Assets Section 7 of IBC Section 18 of Limitation Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login