Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-03-23 allowed

LAXMIKANT & ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS

Bench: 2 — Hemant Gupta, V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

A municipal development plan reserved land for a playground in 2002, but the authorities never acquired it over ten years. The landowner later gave notice to purchase, as permitted by law. The High Court held the reservation had lapsed but gave authorities one additional year to acquire the land. The Supreme Court set aside this one-year extension, holding that statutory timelines for land acquisition are sacrosanct and cannot be extended by courts. Landowners cannot be indefinitely deprived of land use through unimplemented reservations. Once statutory periods expire without acquisition, reservations lapse and ownership rights revive.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Urban Planning Property Rights Constitutional Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Eminent Domain

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login