In Brief
This case concerns the validity of a Will executed by a deceased (Bhagwan Singh) in favour of distant relatives (defendants 2-6), over the claim of his natural brother (plaintiff-appellant). The trial court rejected the Will as surrounded by suspicious circumstances. The First Appellate Court reversed this, accepting the Will as valid. The High Court restored the trial court's judgment. On review, the Supreme Court clarified that under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, the High Court need not frame substantial questions of law but cannot reappreciate evidence to reverse concurrent findings of fact unless perverse. Here, the First Appellate Court wrongly set aside the trial court's judgment without addressing its reasoning. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's restoration of the trial court's decree, holding that a registered Will cannot overcome suspicious circumstances (testator disinherited while depending on plaintiff for care) merely through attesting witness testimony.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.